|
|
The case: After a five‑year collaboration and having already introduced Agile approaches within the company (a multinational corporation), the context was clear from day one: six international teams, distributed across more than 12 countries, tasked with solving highly complex technical issues on packaging machines installed worldwide. Each issue was essentially a project of its own: different customer, different context, different operating conditions. A program like this cannot be managed with standard processes. It requires method - but also cultural sensitivity. Structure - but also adaptability. Agile - but real Agile. And so began a four‑year journey. |
|
PMProgetti's intervention: The starting point included six globally distributed teams, many cultures, and a single shared challenge. Teams were mixed: engineers, technicians, product specialists — people with very different backgrounds and mindsets. Two Scrum Masters, six Product Owners, separate backlogs, rapidly shifting priorities. The complexity wasn’t only technical. It was cultural. How do you create a shared language among people living in different countries, speaking different languages, with different professional habits? How do you build a common way of working when every team faces different problems? Our approach: start from the foundations, together. We began with what we consider essential: training. Not theoretical training, but a practical path built around the real problems of the teams. We organized:
The goal wasn’t to “do Scrum,” but to build a common and sustainable working system that improved communication across teams. Daily complexity: priorities, cultures, suppliers. Each team had its own Product Backlog because each customer had different needs. Priorities shifted frequently, and the most complex solutions required the involvement of external mechanical companies. To prevent teams from becoming isolated, we introduced:
The goal was simple: make work visible, so it can be improved. The roll‑out challenge: launching five more teams in four months. After the first team went live, the challenge was to launch the remaining five teams within four months. It was an intense effort, involving:
And we succeeded. All teams were launched within the expected timeframe. Scrum and SAFe: coordinating without complicating. To manage inter‑team planning — especially when multiple teams worked on the same customer or the same machines — we integrated elements of SAFe and Nexus. Not to create bureaucracy. But to give teams a simple, structured way to:
This became one of the most appreciated aspects of the program, because it transformed complexity into collaboration. Four years later: what truly changed? It wasn’t just the way of working that changed. It was the culture. Teams learned to:
And above all, they learned to trust the process. The truth is: this wasn’t a program. It was a transformation. A transformation made of people, not tools. Of conversations, not procedures. Of small daily improvements, not big announcements. And for us, being part of this journey for more than four years has been a privilege. |
|
